Letters to the Editor, The Age 13/6/2005

Science trampled

The worst thing about the debate on cattle grazing in our alpine national parks is that the science has been ignored for so long. The claim that mountain cattlemen "care" for our alpine country and that herds of cattle don't do enormous damage to fragile alpine ecosystems has been proven again and again to be false.

Our scientists produce hard evidence in peer-reviewed studies, yet for 30 years the facts have been ignored because of an emotive campaign by a few well-connected graziers.

How are we to deal with difficult issues such as storing toxic waste, deepening the Port Phillip channel or improving the health of our river systems if we ignore the studies of our world-class environmental scientists?
Chris Clarke, industrial officer
Science Section, Community and Public Sector Union
Carlton South

Alps immovable

Thanks to Bracks for taking the bull by the horns. And there's been plenty of the stuff flung about over the last month or so. It boils down to an argument over environment versus heritage. The heritage is questionable as most of these farmers on horses jump back into their 4WDs when they get home, and can still muster their cattle from their state forest runs each year any way.

Letting a few people hammer the environment for the sake of a tradition is like saying let's allow the Japanese to continue whaling. The cattle can be moved to less sensitive areas, the alps can't.
Sam Hemmings, Bairnsdale

Heritage attacked

The Howard Government wants to overturn the State Government's ban on grazing in the Alpine National Park to preserve our national heritage. Yet Howard is hell bent on destroying another national heritage - workers' rights - which so many had fought long and hard to achieve.
Henry Herzog, Elwood

Federal hypocrisy

How hypocritical of the Howard Government to moot federal intervention on behalf of the mountain cattlemen when the Federal Government immediately followed the initiative of the NSW Government in banning grazing in alpine national parks a decade ago.

The so-called heritage of alpine grazing is a hangover of the squattocracy days where a few benefited at the expense of the rest. It may be true that mountain cattlemen "care for the high country", but walk through it and try to observe any rectification of cattle damage to the environment on the Bogong High Plains, for example.

The sight of 500 heritage-looking Drizabones on horseback was a splendid sight. Sad the brand is not even Australian. Things have changed.
Ian Muir, Mount Eliza

Splitting image

Several years ago Tom Burlinson was riding a horse to the steps of Parliament House in Sydney demanding the great Snowy River be given decent environmental flows for its survival.

Now he's riding a horse to the steps of Parliament House in Melbourne demanding 8000 cattle be allowed to trample and poo in the same river's headwaters. Is he a tad over-awed by the image of a farmer on a horse?
Jill Redwood, Bonang

Springs destroyed

As a child I lived in the Howqua Valley in north-east Victoria. A neighbour, Jack Hearn, had for years grazed cattle on Mount Clear and Mount Howitt. After my first visit to Mount Howitt in 1951, I spoke to Jack about the lack of water near the summit. I remember his comment very clearly: "There used to be a good spring 200 yards from the top but the cattle trampled it out."

This illustrates the strongest reason why the Government is right to ban cattle from the high country. Many springs (spagnum bogs) have been destroyed or degraded by cattle across all regions of the alps. We cannot afford the resulting loss of summer water flow into our river systems.

We should have followed NSW and banned alpine grazing in 1969.
Rod Lingard, Torquay

Maisie was right

To have an opinion on highland cattle grazing you need to do some research. Maisie Fawcett noticed the degradation of the land that the cattle grazing was causing in 1942. She fenced off areas from cattle; you can still see the differences yourself. Look up Maisie Fawcett on the internet, and then make your now-informed opinion.
Verita Stewart, Eldorado

Water improves

It is great that the Federal Government has listed the high country under its heritage umbrella. With 500 horses filling the Melbourne streets with equine excrement, I have already noticed a drop in the stench of our drinking water. I demand that the crap laid before us on Thursday be gathered up and dumped directly into the reservoirs where it has been mixed with the bovine equivalent for the last 170 years. We want our heritage back!
Lawry Mahon, Footscray

Research ignored

I find it utterly repugnant that uninformed celebrities have the audacity to even utter that there is no evidence for cattle grazing impacting the high country.

This undermines the very essence of scientific investigation and, as a scientist, offends me. Given that our society and a great deal of its technology is based on the work of scientists such as Einstein, Newton and others, it is laughable that so-called celebrities promote themselves to be experts at ecological issues and can have the gall to attempt to discredit research. Stick to acting or whatever you might be actually celebrated for and leave the science to those who have spent the time doing the research.
Michele Kohout, Ferny Creek