| Back to Letters | Back to Forest Letter Watch |
Yes -15%2. Which do you think has greater potential for providing secure, long term jobs in East Gippsland?
No - 50%
Logging 29%3. Do you think old growth native forests should be clearfell logged?
Tourism 59%
Yes 23%4. If there was an alternative for providing sawn timber – such as plantations, would you agree with phasing logging out of native forests?
No 67%
Yes 70%(Plantations exist across the border, closer than the export woodchip mill. As plantations are 10 times more productive than native forests, small areas of marginal land could be used for the industry’s needs)
No 24%
5. Is there too much woodchipping, too little, just enough?
Too much – 46%(In the ‘woodchip epicentre’ of Victoria, more people think woodchip levels are too high).
Too little – 6%
Just right – 23%
There is no clear support for what the government did with Goolengook. There is no clear support for the way the NRE manages the forests.
The poll cost the small East Gippsland environment group $7000 of their meager funds. Could have commissioned a $4000 poll but wanted it to be spotless and credible. CROEG has been campaigning for forests for the past 20 years – this has finally shown how much support is out there locally for their stand.
| Back to Letters | Back to Forest Letter Watch |