Submission to the Submission to the West Victoria RFA independent panel

(on West Victoria Regional Forest Agreement Consultation Paper)

Peter Campbell, 25/2/2000

Back to Letters Back to Forest Letter Watch

The Chair
West Victoria RFA Independent Panel
PO Box 502
EAST MELBOURNE VIC 3002

The draft consultation paper is a great disappointment.  The reserve system proposed is about the same as the existing Otway Forest management Plan reserve system, which is not large enough.

There is a lack of real consideration given to the "non-timber" values of the Otway Forests including water, tourism and biodiversity, as per my comments that follow.
 

1. Woodchips

The timber industry in the Otway is predominantly woodchip-driven.  The proposed RFA sanctions this and will allow even greater levels of woodchip production for the next 20 years.  (as per reference on p2 ch 4 "On completion of a West RFA, the Commonwealth will remove export controls on unprocessed native hardwood sources from the regions").  This effectively means that there will be no limits on volumes of woodchips exported.

The proposed reduction in sawlog quotas really means that more sawlogs will be diverted to woodchip production (graded as D logs).  The logging of forests will actually increase, to provide greater volumes of woodchips.

Important information on woodchip volumes is missing from the RFA.   The RFA needs to define what is meant by "sawlog driven industry" and adopt a "whole log" approach.

Woodchipping results in the clearfelling and destruction of Otways forest and provides very few jobs in the region.  It is environmentally and economically not justifiable.
 

2. Reserve System

The Draft Comprehensive, Adequate and Representative (CAR) Reserve System in reality has very little new reserves, the reserves are almost exactly the same as the existing Forest Management Plan.

The reserves are scattered, small and lineal, lack linkages and corridors and so fail to guarantee future biodiversity.  It is a token reserve system that seems to indicate a Government strategy of adding dry, degraded forest areas to the reserve system, at the expense of the more profitable, tall Eucalypt, timber/woodchip production forest areas.

Page 14 paragraph 2 of the Consultation paper admits that guidelines have been breached by not fully protecting 21 Ecological Vegetation Classes that should have received protection, but won't be protected because of "requirements for timber resources....f'irewood and other forest products".   In addition, even the proposed reserves could be woodchipped and logged if such uses were "considered appropriate".

The Government must seriously consider an extension of the Otway National Park and the Lorne Angehook State Park to incorporate water catchments and important wildlife corridors.

A much better, linked and representative reserve system (containing tall Eucalypt forests) is essential to preserve the intrinsic values (such as biodiversity and water catchment quality) of the Otways forests.
 

3.  Endangered Species

I have serious concerns for the conservation of the endangered Tiger Quoll or Spot-tailed Quoll under the proposed reserve system. While Table 3.4 summarizes conservation guidelines for the species, the crucial report about to Tiger Quoll numbers and habitat areas in the region has not been released.  Despite repeated requests DNREs response remains that this Quoll report has not been completed.

This report must be released before any significant decisions regarding Tiger Quoll habitat in the region is made.
 

4. Water Catchments

The RFA in its current format will not protect domestic water catchments for Geelong and Warnambool, and may go further to lift the current moratorium upon logging water catchments in Apollo Bay. This is not acceptable.  A closed catchment policy that protects domestic water catchments is essential.  The future of our water supply depends upon the protection of the Otway Forests.

Logging in water catchments must cease.
 

5. Tourism

It is very disappointing that little or no consideration is given to non-timber forest values such as tourism in the consultation paper. A small section on page 20 of Chapter 4 downplays the significance that the tourism industry has to the Otways regional economy. Important suggestions made to the RFA steering committee by the public have not been included in this section.

An inquiry into the Tourism potential of the area is urgently required to conduct comprehensive landscape studies, and a real assessment of projects such as the Trans-Otway Walking Track and the extension of the national Parks System in the Otways,

If the reserve system is extended to incorporate water catchments and important wildlife corridors it will preserve the tourist potential of the area, which is currently rapidly diminishing.
 

Summary

To date the RFA process has placed timber industry concerns above those of the public.  I have personally visited many forest areas in the Otways, and have been appalled by the destruction resulting from logging regions such as the Grey River Road and Mt Sabine, to name a few.

I am deeply concerned that the RFA process to date has failed to consider the impacts of native forest logging activities on all other industries in the region, particularly tourism, agriculture and fishing. Overall, a more holistic approach to the RFA needs to be adopted. Non-timber industries already employ over 90% of people in the region, and it is not appropriate to ignore the negative effect native forest logging activities has on those industries.  Opportunities for growth in these other regional industries must not be compromised by inappropriate logging and woodchipping regimes.

It is quite clear now that the RFA process has failed to deliver a "balanced outcome" for management of forest regions, to date they have only resulted in ongoing destruction and degradation of native forests, primarily for the production of low-value woodchips.

I strongly suggest that the whole RFA process to be reviewed with a view to including genuine community consultation and delivering better conservation outcomes, bearing in mind that over 80% of the Australian public are opposed to woodchipping.

In the meanwhile, a moratorium on logging Otways forests is required.

Yours sincerely,
 
 

Peter Campbell

CC: The Hon. Sherryl Garbutt, Minister for Conservation and Environment


Back to Letters Back to Forest Letter Watch